"Bringing Clarity, Acuity and
Veracity to Vital Issues and Events at Home and Around the Globe"
___
Truth will surface,
like bubbles from the deep!
___
"The clear goal of
American foreign policy [must be] most of all to advance and protect the cause of world
freedom
so that some day every man, woman and child on this earth has as a birthright the full
blessings of liberty." Ronald Reagan
Special Reports Archives 2006
CHRONOLOGICAL INDEX
More Special Reports Archives:
2006200520042003, 2002, 2001 and 2000 This index gives titles and summaries of
special reports in the Perspicacity Press
Online
Archives by date posted.
For an alphabetical index of special reports by topic, go to: Topical Index
To see the Perspicacity Press News Flash archives, go
HERE.
To see the Point & Counterpoint archives, go
HERE.
COMMENTARY:
A Glimmer of Hope for Vietnam
Saturday, July 7, 2006
Recent changes in the government of Communist Vietnam may hold some possibility of moving the country in
the direction of a more free, open and democratic society.
By Rand GreenREAD THE FULL
STORY
Joining the Club: MoreHyannisport Hypocrisy
July 7, 2005
SEN. EDWARD KENNEDY, in a written document, demanded
that judicial nominee Jerome A. Holmes explain why he did not resign sooner
from a dining club whose membership is restricted to males. Kennedy, of course, can in good conscience hold Holmes
accountable for so vile an act as belonging to an all-male club. Kennedy’s
hands are clean. He’d washed them a month before Holmes washed his.
By Rand GreenREAD THE FULL
STORY
Liberal invective is all about
Bush? I don't think so
Wednesday, June 28, 2006
The liberal-elites in the Democratic party – and that
includes virtually everyone currently in party leadership – often seem
driven more by hatred than by anything else. Many in the liberal media seem
possessed by a similar vitriol. Some conservatives have convinced themselves
that this liberal ill will is directed principally, if not solely, at
George W. Bush and the Bush Administration. It would be nice if it were
that simple. By Rand GreenREAD
THE FULL STORY
America and the
United Nations
"AT ONE LEVEL, the United Nations is merely the latest variant on the
Congress of Vienna held almost two centuries agoâ€â€a venue where the great
powers sit down to resolve the problems of the world to their mutual
satisfaction. Unfortunately ... the UN has become the repository of all the West’s
sappiest illusions of one-worldism." By Mark Steyn.
From a Dec. 5, 2005 speech. READ THE TRANSCRIPT
Ah! Chihuahua! You
can't
name your baby that!
You think you can name your baby anything you want? Not
if you live in the state of Chihuahua, Mexico, you can’t. The state
government, there, has strict rules on what parents can name their babies
and even how the names must be spelled, reported El Paso’s KVIA Television
on June 28. By Rand Green READ THE
FULL STORY
American
Leadership andthe Blessings of Freedom
Friday, June 14, 2006
"America can and
must be a force for good in the world. The President and I believe that the
United States must remain engaged as a leader in events beyond our borders.
We believe this because we are guided by the same enduring principle that
gave birth to our own nation: Human dignity is not a government's grant to
its citizens nor mankind's gift to one another; it is God's endowment to all
humanity." By Condoleezza
Rice.
READ THE TRANSCRIPT
Cooperation among
free nations to combat threats to global freedom
SINGAPORE - Sat., June 3, 2006
"Today we face
a situation in the Pacific, and indeed globally, where, paradoxically, more
nations are freer then ever before, yet freedom is increasingly under
assault -- by the designs of violent extremists and rogue regimes. In the present security environment, cooperation among free nations
is not simply desirable, it’s critical."
By Donald Rumsfeld.READ THE
TRANSCRIPT
Know the Enemy
Extracted from an address delivered to
the graduating class of the U.S. Navel
Academy in Annapolis, Maryland, on May
26, 2006 To prevail in
[the global war on terror], we must
understand the nature of the enemy that
threatens America and the civilized
world. It is as brutal and heartless as
any we have ever faced.
By Vice President
Richard Cheney.
READ MORE
COMMENTARY: Saddam Had 'Em: Iraq's WMD threat
was real
Tuesday, May 16, 2006
What President Bush said, leading up to the war, was
never a lie. Saddam did have WMD, and he had active WMD programs,
right up to the eve of the U.S. invasion in March 2003. The final report of
the CIA’s Iraqi Survey Group (sometimes referred to as the Duelfer Report)
confirms that fact, even though selective extracts from that very report are
often cited by Bush critics as proof to the contrary.
By Rand Green.READ THE COMPLETE COMMENTARY
SPECIAL REPORT:
Embroiled
in Oil: How American Dependence on
Foreign Crude
Is BankrollingAmerica’s Enemies
Sunday, May 7, 2006
The high price of oil is indeed a concern – not because
American consumers are getting soaked at pump, not because U.S. oil
companies are making “windfall†profits, but because countries such as Iran,
whose Islamo-fascist rulers have vowed our destruction, are raking in
staggering sums of money which they are investing in weapons, nuclear and
other, with which they hope to annihilate us.
By Rand Green.READ THE FULL
REPORT
COMMENTARY:
Just what part of
the word 'temporary' don't
politicians understand?
Tuesday, April 10, 2006 President
Bush has said that he is "firmly
opposed" to amnesty for illegal
immigrants but favors a guest worker
program that allows them to "apply for
legal status on a temporary basis." The
Senate has come dangerously close to
passing a disastrous bill that would
basically allow millions of illegal
immigrants to buy permanent status and
eventual citizenship for a couple of
grand. That is de facto amnesty,
and if such a law comes to the
president's desk, he should veto it. No
illegal immigrant should be allowed to
apply for guest worker status without
having first showed contrition and done
something to reasonably and justly pay
for having violated the law: not just a
fine but something more, such as several
hundred hours of meaningful public
service.
By Rand Green.
READ THE FULL COMMENTARY
Air war
strategy preserved Iraqi
infrastructure and lives WASHINGTON - Mon., April
10, 2006 (AFPS)
Under international rules of war, civilians
near legitimate military targets might regretfully become casualties
during an attack. But U.S. and coalition
officials "took a much more restrictive interpretation" of the law of
war during the planning of military air strikes in Iraq,
said Maj. Michael Norton, a South Carolina Air National Guard
F-16 pilot who was part of the Coalitian's aerial
vanguard in Iraq. As a result, the number of Iraqi civilian
casualties caused by U.S. and coalition aerial attacks
'was very low'"
during Operation Iraqi Freedom, he said.
By Jim Garamone.READ THE FULL
STORY
EXCLUSIVE SPECIAL REPORT:
The Iranian Threat: Finishingthe Job in the Middle East
Wednesday, March 29, 2006
Iran's leaders have declared their
intent to destroy Israel and America.
They are aiding terrorist groups, and
they are vigorously pursuing nuclear
weapons. The United States faces
no greater threat. Dealing firmly with
Iran is imperative. But Newt Gingrich
put it well when he said in recent
testimony before a Senate subcommittee:
"There
is an extraordinary opportunity for
every peace loving and civilized country
in the world, led by the United States,
to support a democracy movement within
Iran to achieve regime change short of
armed conflict. Indeed, the most
significant allies in a U.S. policy of
regime change in Iran are likely to be
the Iranian people themselves."
By Rand Green.
READ THE COMPLETE REPORT
President Bush
discusses freedom
and democracy in Iraq
Wednesday, March 29, 2006
In a speech delivered at Freedom House,
President Bush discussed what is at
state in Iraq, America's "efforts
to help the Iraqi people overcome past
divisions and form a lasting democracy,
and why it is vital to the security of
the American people that we help them
succeed."
If the United States
leaves Iraq "before the job is done,"
he said, "the terrorists will move in and fill the vacuum, and
they will use that failed state to bring murder and destruction to
freedom-loving nations." MORE
EXCLUSIVE
SPECIAL REPORT:
Borderline Schizophrenia
An in-depth look
at U.S. Border Security and Immigration
Policy
plus some
clear-headed proposals for dealing with
this complex and highly emotional issue.
Posted
Tues., Mar. 28, 2006
(Originally published in Perspicacity
Press, February 2006 print edition)
It
is imperative
for the security and territorial
integrity of the United States that we
control who comes across our borders,
and particularly those who come with the
intent to stay. If they wish to
become loyal, law-abiding Americans, we
should welcome them. If they
mean to do us harm, if they have
criminal intent, or if they think that
the states from California to Texas are
rightly theirs, they have no business
coming here.
By Rand Green.
READ THE COMPLETE REPORT.
SPECIAL REPORT: State Department releases
Country Reports
on
Human Rights Practices Wednesday, March
8, 2006
"The
United States and other free nations have a duty to defend human
rights and help spread democracy’s blessings,"
wrote U.S. Secretary of State
Condoleeza Rice in
the preface to the Country Reports on Human Rights Abuses for
2005, released today.
"We must help countries develop the
democratic institutions that will ensure human rights are
respected over the long term. We must help fragile democracies
deliver a better life for their citizens. We must call countries
to account when they retreat from their international human
rights commitments. And we must always stand in solidarity with
the courageous men and women across the globe that live in fear
yet dream of freedom. "Defending and advancing
human rights and democratic principles keeps faith with our
country’s most cherished values and lays the foundation for
lasting world peace."MORE
COMMENTARY: Student group's plans to
display Mohammed cartoons
are
'drawing condemnation'
Tuesday, Feb. 28,
2005
“Plans by a Republican student group at [the
University of California, Irvine] to showcase the controversial
cartoons of the prophet Muhammad that led to violent protests
around the world are drawing condemnation from Muslim groups and
university officials.†So stated a recent
article by Daniel Yi in the Los Angeles Times.
It is understandable that Muslims would be offended by the
cartoons, first published in September in a Danish newspaper.
But when
someone does something to offend you, there are more appropriate
ways to deal with the insult than arson and mayhem. There are
things like – well, like holding a panel discussion and airing
your views in a civil manner. That is what the Campus
Republicans at UC Irvine are doing. They are not choosing to
display the Danish cartoons because they wish to offend but
because they have been deeply offended by the way
murderous mobs blamed the entire Western world for the works of
a few cartoonists published by a handful of newspapers. They
have a right to take offense. But they have not chosen to
respond by burning down the local mosque or pelting rocks at any
Muslim they see. They would never consider such a response. Let
us hope the Muslims on campus at UC Irvine will take a page from
that book and join them in a civilized dialog rather than resort
to violence.By Rand Green.READ
THE FULL COMMENTARY
Rumsfeld: U.S. must outdo terrorists
in public opinion battle
WASHINGTON–
Sat., Feb. 18 (AFPS)
The war on terror is unlike any conflict the U.S.
has ever faced, and some of the most important battles are
fought not on the ground, but in newsrooms around the world,
Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld said.
By Sgt. Sara Wood.
READ THE COMPLETE
STORY
ANALYSIS Hamas: See what
'democracy'hath wrought!
How should the world respond when
terroristsprevail in free elections?
Monday, Jan. 30,
2006 THE
PALESTINIAN TERRORIST organization Hamas, whose core objective
is the obliteration of Israel, won a landslide victory in
Palestinian parliamentary elections on Thursday, Jan. 26.But that election did not create a
democratic Palestinian government, nor even a
legitimate government. It put a terrorist organization in
control of the Palestinian parliament, nothing more.No government, no ruling political party or potentate has
any right to pursue acts of terror, targeted mass murder of
innocents, and genocide against any other nation, group or
people, or against its own people, no matter by what means it
has come into power. Being elected by the people does not confer
that right.By Rand Green.MORE
Info as important asammo
in 'Long War'
WASHINGTON - Tues., Jan. 24, 2006 (AFPS) In the so-called "Long War"[against
radical Islamo-fascist terrorism], information will be as
important as ammunition, a senior military officer said. "It is clear
... in a global perspective how important information is and its ability
to influence people and their ideas," said
Army Lt. Gen. Ray Odierno, assistant to the chairman of the Joint Chiefs
of Staff. "Once we are successful in Iraq and
Afghanistan, the extremists will be looking for another place to
continue their mission - and it could be anyplace in the world. We have
to interdict and stay ahead of them," he said.By Jim Garamone.READ
THE FULL STORY
Violence will not deraildemocracy in Iraq
Tuesday, Jan. 24, 2006
The people of Iraq have chosen democracy and have exercised the
right to elect their own leaders. According
to U.S. Army Gen. George W. Casey Jr.,
Multinational Force-Iraq Commanding General,
that decision is one that will not "be undone by those
who only offer murder, violence and a return to the old ways."By Rand
GreenREAD THE
FULL STORY
President Bush defends terrorist surveillance
Extracted
from a speech delivered at Kansas State University
Monday, Jan. 23,
2006READ THE
PRESIDENT'S REMARKS
NEWS FROM SFI
Spread Freedom
Institute launches Perspicacity Press print version in
new, expanded format
Visitors to this website can
get the first three issues free
CLOVIS, CA
(Jan. 19, 2006)
Spread
Freedom Institute is pleased to announce the expansion and
re-design of its monthly ink-and-paper publication,
Perspicacity Press, and to offer visitors to the
Perspicacity Press website, for a
limited time, a free short-term (three-month) subscription. Now in its seventh year,
the print version of Perspicacity Press (originally
titled Perspicacity & Paradigms) predates the launching
of the Perspicacity Press website (),
the Perspicacity eLetter, and even the founding of Spread
Freedom Institute. It was, in fact, the venture that eventually
evolved into Spread Freedom Institute, as some of
the long-time readers
of Perspicacity Presswill
recall. Originally published in a
newsletter format with issues running anywhere from two to 12
pages, Perspicacity Press will now be published monthly
in digest format (5-1/2 inches by 8-1/2 inches), with a minimum
of 32 pages in each issue, some of them in full color. The first
issue in the new format came out in January, and the February
issue will be off the press shortly.
If you are currently a subscriber
to the print version of Perspicacity Press, you may
have already received your first issue in the new format, or
will shortly. If not, we are pleased to offer you, as a visitor
to this website, a free short-term subscription to the print
version. Simply send an email to
with the mailing address to
which you would like your Perspicacity Press copies
sent. Please enter the words "three free issues" in the subject
line. We will mail you the January, February and March 2006
issues of the new
Perspicacity Press
at no charge.
The price of a full subscription to the
new Perspicacity Press is just $18 a year (for 12
issues). After your three-month free trial subscription has
begun, we will mail you a no-obligation invoice for a full
subscription beginning with the April 2006 issue and continuing
through March 2007. If for any reason you do not wish to
continue receiving Perspicacity Press, just write
"cancel" on the invoice and return it to us. You will still
receive your three free issues, and they are yours to keep.
Perspicaciously Yours, Rand Green
Editor & Publisher
Perspicacity Press
General predicts
fewer Sunni
ties to terrorists
WASHINGTON
–
Fri., Jan. 20, 2005 (AFPS) Iraqi
Sunnis who may have partnered with foreign terrorist groups in
the past will abandon that practice because it's against their
interests, the U.S. officer in charge of operations in northern
Iraq predicted today. By Gerry J. Gilmore.READ
THE FULL STORY
Steady Progress
in War on Terror Thursday, Jan. 19, 2006 "The United States is a good and a
generous land. We're a nation that believes in ideals, that
upholds them in our own country, and that acts on them
throughout the world," said Vice President
Richard Cheney in a speech today."From
providing more global food aid, by far, than any other nation,
to supporting life-saving treatments for hundreds of thousands
of Sub-Saharan Africans living with HIV/AIDS, to standing with
freedom-loving peoples in the struggle against tyranny and
terror, we do great good in this world. And in 2006 and beyond,
we will do even more as we serve humanity and justice, the
dignity of the individual, the rights of mankind, and the cause
of liberty." READ
MORE
Americans for Tax
Reform releases lists of enemies and friends of the taxpayer
Wednesday, Jan. 18,
2006
Both lists are reproduced
here, along with the reasons each individual or group of
individuals made the list, as well as a few apropos editorial
comments by Perspicacity Press. VIEW
THE COMPLETE LIST
Uzbek court suspends
NGOhuman rights programs
TASHKENT, Uzbekistan
- Jan. 13, 2006
"There has been a dramatic
increase in government harassment of civil society across
Central Asia, but [Uzbek] President
Karimov has taken particularly drastic measures against local
and international NGOs in Uzbekistan, which is among the most
repressive regimes in the world," said Freedom House Executive
Director Jennifer Windsor. "The effect of excluding
international actors from Uzbekistan is to further isolate the
brave advocates for democracy and human rights within the
country from support networks. The intention of the government
is therefore very clear."READ FULL REPORT
Martin Luther King'sconservative legacy Thursday, Jan. 12, 2006 (Heritage Foundation)
IT IS TIME for
conservatives to lay claim to the legacy of the Rev. Martin
Luther King, Jr.King was no stalwart
conservative, yet his core beliefs, such as the power and
necessity of faith-based association and self-government based
on absolute truth and moral law, are profoundly conservative.
Modern liberalism rejects these ideas, while conservatives place
them at the center of their philosophy. Despite decades of its
appropriation by liberals, King’s message was fundamentally
conservative.
By Carolyn Garris.READ THE FULL COMMENTARY
Iranian Kurds form frontto demand rights
Thursday, Jan. 3, 2005 (RFE/RL)
A group of Iranian Kurds
has created a movement aimed at "peacefully" promoting democracy
and demanding rights that they say have been neglected. By Golnaz Esfandiari.READ THE FULL
REPORT